Some in church leadership today are suggesting that many officers and soldiers of The Salvation Army need to 'revisit' the whole notion of personal visitation in Corps ministry and it's essential nature.
I find it interesting that it even needs to be discussed. In seminaries everywhere visitation is taught as an essential, indispensable part of the pastoral ministry. A church cannot experience meaningful growth without it and a Pastor cannot shepherd their flock if they do not practice it vigorously.
I also find it interesting that we live in a day and age where our officers prefer being referred to as "Pastor" yet many of them do not carry on a pastoral ministry.
Yes, this subject needs to be 'revisited'. The need goes beyond discussion, however. It must be an integral part of how we spend our ministry time if we desire to truly be a Pastor in it's most true sense.
The title of this editorial is, "The Passing of Personal Visitation". Some may think this is a bit extreme. I don't think so! The truth is, more and more, Salvation Army officers are not visiting their flock where they are most comfortable, that is, in their homes. It is in this environment that they can "Do the Most Good!".
Now, I have heard all of the reasons for 'not getting around to it'. Many feel that they see their soldiers and adherents through the week at Corps activities and in home contact is not necessary. Other have told me they just do not have the time given the many demands placed upon them. Of course neither of these rationale's hold up to scrutiny. The Corps Officer has more flexibility to determine their schedules and priorities than officers in institutional appointments or DHQ positions. If visitation is a priority for the Corps Officer, they can make time. They are in charge.
The fact that one 'sees' their people throughout the week does not negate the need for more personal contact and discipling.
Personal visitation is a given for all those who like to think of themselves as 'Pastors'.
Let's all take time to pray for our leaders who carry great burdens and responsibilities...that God will point the way. Let's ask God's Holy Spirit to 'revisit' us and provide much needed instruction as to how we need to be serving Him better and more effectively.
What do you think? Feel free to post a comment.
Gary,
ReplyDeleteI would have to admit that this is a serious issue and many officers and pastors opt out of any consistent visitation. In many of our appointments some soldiers were of the mindset that we saw them enough at the corps. It was a bit awkward at times. If we were requested to visit we would honor that request. That would often bring a closer bond and produced a better fellowship also.
I have seen in a few of the huge churches that we visited that there was not a real plan for visitation or contact other than a letter of welcome and at one a request for additional money for the teen facility. Where there is a large congregation it is understood that the pastor cannot visit everyone but someone on staff should be making that connection. I have also seen officers that felt that visitation was beneath them and others just did not take the time. I would think that anyone that is involved in ministry as a corps officer or a pastor would see the benefits and need of visiting people in their homes. I also know that some officers see their role as something different and when a visit is sought it is usually too late. It is a sorry state of many corps and churches and the wise pastor would seek after his congregation and have a plan to visit everyone in due time.
When people are prayed for and visited in their home it is a very special time and ministry which is appreciated and causes a loving bond.
Blessings,
Bob Deidrick
It seemed at times that there were so many voices needing attention that it was easy to get sidetracked. PR issues, AdBd's regular activities and items demanded by DHQ. It was tough. Donna visits her flock on a regular basis. There are those who say, don't visit as I know you have a lot to do. Some visits are a must,ie hospital, ER, etc.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comments Bob and Ted. I am hoping others will share their thoughts as well. It is never my intent to be critical, however, I do believe that it is useful to raise these and other issues. I appreciate everyone's input.
ReplyDeleteBlessings!